I want to take ,with disinterested spirit , the concept of "elegance" from the sphere of science and translate it to that of art criticism to evaluate , tests its effectiveness in appreciation of the rings of Saturn placed in the frame of art by Chiariello.
Again Hawking : << ... The elegance is not something that can be measured easily, but is held in high esteem by scientists because the purpose of the laws of nature is to condense in an economic way a number of special cases in a simple formula >> .
PieroChiariello tracing a straight chrome light path of all the particles that at the time of the snapshot of Saturn's rings were in the vertical line of his choice , does not perform a sort of minimal formal analysis that reduces and condense the details, the iconic accidents of the image to its immanent, independent,pure traits ? and therefore, by "simple formula" ? But here , you know, we are in the frame of the aesthetic experience and not that of scientific experience : if for the "elegant" scientific formula the "condensation " of the particular situation has a cognitive purpose, instrumental, aims to the univocally , transitivity , to the reduction of the ambiguity of the "fact" observed , the elegant formula artistic-aesthetic , pursues and preserves , however, the plurivocity , the synchronic coexistence of multiple senses, never resolving in a linear and transmissible way.
The rings of Saturn - as elements of the universe - there are elegant as ordering and adorn themselves : they are an autopoietic system . The artist who wants to render visible and intelligible to the user their elegant autopoiesis should shrink from the principle of representation and pursue, instead , that of the resubmission . Is what, at first, the photograph allows to Piero Chiariello (remember the astrophotograph taken from the web which it was said before).
Photography, both digital and analog , is essentially indexical , it is an imprint of reality and not his representation . Whether it appears iconic and non-iconic it should never be understood as a re-creation of the world or the cosmo's cut-outs , but rather as them extension or trace.
Using " pull in " the potential of digital manipulation , Chiariello deconstructs the illusionistic iconicity of the photograph to intensify the presentational purposes and then amplify conceptually and sensorially the sense of the presence of the "rings" of which it is the index . In this way, the receiver of the pattern chrome -bright of the rings of Saturn is encouraged to contemplate it as contrail of a fragment of the cosmos itself already ornate , elegant in itself : autotelic.
[ February 24, 2014 ]
iCfr. Stephen Hawking, 2011, Il Grande disegno, Mondadori, Milano.
iiCfr. Renato Barilli, 1989, Corso di Estetica, il Mulino, Bologna.
iiiCfr. Claudio Marra, 2006, L'immagine infedele. La falsa rivoluzione della fotografia digitale, Mondadori, Milano.